“It’s not the school that’s the problem, it’s the Principal of the thing”
When things just don’t seem right, when it feels like the inmates are running the asylum, our first reaction is to start blaming people. The leaders, the followers, anyone, it doesn’t really matter. What is hard for us is to imagine that perhaps we are reading the instructions wrong and the ensuing chaos is just a result of misdirection.
Our instinct is so powerful about not allowing ourselves to consider the explanation of the playbook being wrong, it can only stem from one vitally important trait, our ego. Our egos often cause myopic vision, with our explanation being the only right, or at the bare minimum, plausible way.
Theology is such a concept. There are three things I can tell you I believe hold to all theological ideas and I hope we can grow together to use these three as a starting point for rich and meaningful dialogue.
First and foremost, theology is a human enterprise. We would like to condense all theological tenets under the guise of “God-inspired” or “total truth”, but there are conditions today in our Christian faith that make these claims impossible.
I have heard there are as many as 26,000 Christian denominations operating in the United States today. I don’t know if that is correct, so for sake of time, let’s narrow the field to 1,000. That means there are 1,000 differing views on the same theology. 1,000 different views on Scripture. 1,000 different views on many deeply held beliefs about Jesus. That is a lot of difference. That vast difference makes it very difficult to press the idea of theology being all about God’s truth. Theology is a human enterprise.
That shouldn’t be a bad thing. It really relates to the idea that we are all struggling with the ideas and concepts of Scripture and how we should accurately teach and deploy them in our everyday lives. Further, the way we express and teach these ideas will change as our lives, cultures and environments change. For example, how many of us are preaching against the sin of slavery? We need to embrace the fact that while Biblical Truths never change, Biblical Methods do.
Because theological ideas and tenets function this way, we must also realize that theology is a human enterprise with a local influence. Theology in the poorest of countries varies in its applications and meanings than say theology in the Land of Plenty. Our theology on a personal level can charge with the advent of a tragic event, such as the death of a daughter. These are experiences I have readily seen and heard of myself.
My overarching concern isn’t that our theology differs. I actually see it as a beautiful thing. The concern is that we argue, debate and vilify people with differing theological views to the point we are actively destroying the faith. I don’t think this is an intentional act as much as a painful side-effect.
Secondly, theology is an ongoing conversation. Think about it like this; all those commentaries didn’t get written until someone talked about writing them. Good theology is not built out of response to a heresy or in a vacuum. Good theology is conversational, involving diverse parties for the purpose of understanding how we arrived to be different, and also concluding on all the things we are the same about.
The biblical proverb “iron sharpens iron” explains exactly how theological ideas get honed in community. “Anyone, anytime, anyplace” needs to be our commitment to go anywhere to converse and learn from even our staunchest critics, to listen for the places they are wrong or misguided, and to respond to the charges and concerns they have against us. The posture during these conversations is meant to be open and earnest, not defensive.
When I read the works of theologians of the past, well-known and well-read alike, my sense is not a pervading arrogance as if they we setting the tone for Christian theology time immortal. They, as we do, were wrestling with their theology in a constantly changing religious and cultural environment. I don’t see Spurgeon or Moody (maybe Moody) coming back and saying to us, “What a mess you let this get. We gave you all the directions you needed”.
Thirdly, and the hardest to perhaps swallow, is that theology is temporary.
As we have discussed, our theology (religious persuasions and opinions) are held by us locally, contained in our current dialogue and practiced today in our churches, we must hold them humbly. What we do here in our spiritual confines and denominations at times will not work in other spiritual arenas.
We must learn to carry our theologies with open hand. To assume that our convictions about God are timeless and others are simply wrong, is the deepest arrogance possible. It establishes an imperialistic attitude that has a chilling effect on honest conversation that is needed for Christianity to regroup if we have any intent of restoring the world as Jesus commanded.
Using terms such as “pin it down”, “sum it up” or “in a nutshell” to describe any belief about God or God’s Kingdom needs to be rejected harshly. God is God, which means He is expansive, explosive and most of all, not subject to abide by our theologies about Him. We will never be able to hermetically seal God’s ever-expanding Kingdom or our experiences of and articulations of that Kingdom.
To move forward, we need to be willing to admit in the past we have had it wrong. Not allowing non-whites to drink from the same water fountain as whites-we had it wrong. Not allowing women to vote-we had it wrong. Making those that see it differently than us our enemies-we still have it wrong.
I don’t know what side of the coin I would have been on a century ago on these matters. But I can say I have learned enough to know I might be wrong today. Because of that, I approach each matter of theology with Biblical humility and not relativistic apathy.
David Fournier
Restoring Grace

